The area that
is now known as Hallandale Beach was not even settled
until the late 1800's, when Henry Morrison Flagler
expanded the Florida East Coast Railway to Palm Beach
in 1895. Before then, there wasn't much to Hallandale
Beach except swamp and a gray, sandy soil called marl.
The Seminole Indians would hunt in the area and gather
cootie root, which was used to produce starchy dough.
Flagler recruited Luther Halland, son of a Swedish
minister and brother-in-law to one of Flagler's agents,
to start a Swedish settlement south of the Danish
settlement of Dania. With the assistance of an immigrant
named Olaf Zetterlund, Halland began promoting the
frost-free subtropical climate and cheap land of Halland
(later to be named Hallandale). Halland set up a small
trading post in the new community and became its first
postmaster.
Settlement was slow, with only a dozen families in
town by 1900 - seven Swedish, three English, and two
black. The first school was built in 1904 and had
only ten students. The first church, Bethlehem Lutheran,
was established in 1906. Originally, Hallandale was
a farming community, with farmers using the beach
only for recreation.
Hallandale officially became a town on May 14, 1927.
By that time, there were 1,500 residents, street lights,
and electricity in the community. In 1947, Hallandale
was reincorporated as a city, and was allowed to annex
land to the east. In August of 1999, the city officially
changed its name to Hallandale Beach.
|
|
|
|
Subject
|
Number |
Percent |
| |
|
|
| EMPLOYMENT STATUS |
|
|
| Population
16 years and over |
30,391 |
100.0 |
| In labor force |
14,359 |
47.2 |
| Civilian
labor force |
14,359 |
47.2 |
| Employed |
13,329 |
43.9 |
| Unemployed |
1,030 |
3.4 |
| Percent
of civilian labor force |
7.2 |
(X) |
| Armed
Forces |
0 |
0.0 |
| Not in labor force |
16,032 |
52.8 |
| |
|
|
| Females
16 years and over |
16,641 |
100.0 |
| In labor force |
6,893 |
41.4 |
| Civilian
labor force |
6,893 |
41.4 |
| Employed |
6,392 |
38.4 |
| |
|
|
| Own
children under 6 years |
1,437 |
100.0 |
| All parents in family
in labor force |
919 |
64.0 |
| |
|
|
| COMMUTING TO WORK |
|
|
| Workers
16 years and over |
12,962 |
100.0 |
| Car, truck, or van --
drove alone |
9,927 |
76.6 |
| Car, truck, or van --
carpooled |
1,502 |
11.6 |
| Public transportation
(including taxicab) |
551 |
4.3 |
| Walked |
357 |
2.8 |
| Other means |
214 |
1.7 |
| Worked at home |
411 |
3.2 |
| Mean travel time to
work (minutes) |
27.8 |
(X) |
| |
|
|
| Employed
civilian population 16 years and over |
13,329 |
100.0 |
| OCCUPATION |
|
|
| Management, professional,
and related occupations |
3,695 |
27.7 |
| Service occupations |
2,726 |
20.5 |
| Sales and office occupations |
4,314 |
32.4 |
| Farming, fishing, and
forestry occupations |
16 |
0.1 |
| Construction, extraction,
and maintenance occupations |
1,107 |
8.3 |
| Production, transportation,
and material moving occupations |
1,471 |
11.0 |
| |
|
|
| INDUSTRY |
|
|
| Agriculture, forestry,
fishing and hunting, and mining |
23 |
0.2 |
| Construction |
941 |
7.1 |
| Manufacturing |
815 |
6.1 |
| Wholesale trade |
672 |
5.0 |
| Retail trade |
2,159 |
16.2 |
| Transportation and warehousing,
and utilities |
808 |
6.1 |
| Information |
332 |
2.5 |
| Finance, insurance,
real estate, and rental and leasing |
1,262 |
9.5 |
| Professional, scientific,
management, administrative, and waste management services |
1,172 |
8.8 |
| Educational, health
and social services |
2,094 |
15.7 |
| Arts, entertainment,
recreation, accommodation and food services |
1,700 |
12.8 |
| Other services (except
public administration) |
860 |
6.5 |
| Public administration |
491 |
3.7 |
| |
|
|
| CLASS OF WORKER |
|
|
| Private wage and salary
workers |
10,969 |
82.3 |
| Government workers |
1,337 |
10.0 |
| Self-employed workers
in own not incorporated business |
985 |
7.4 |
| Unpaid family workers |
38 |
0.3 |
| |
|
|
| INCOME IN 1999 |
|
|
| Households |
18,178 |
100.0 |
| Less than $10,000 |
2,547 |
14.0 |
| $10,000 to $14,999 |
2,057 |
11.3 |
| $15,000 to $24,999 |
3,406 |
18.7 |
| $25,000 to $34,999 |
2,656 |
14.6 |
| $35,000 to $49,999 |
2,640 |
14.5 |
| $50,000 to $74,999 |
2,620 |
14.4 |
| $75,000 to $99,999 |
1,056 |
5.8 |
| $100,000 to $149,999 |
704 |
3.9 |
| $150,000 to $199,999 |
279 |
1.5 |
| $200,000 or more |
213 |
1.2 |
| Median household income
(dollars) |
28,266 |
(X) |
| |
|
|
| With earnings |
10,269 |
56.5 |
| Mean
earnings (dollars) |
43,236 |
(X) |
| With Social Security
income |
8,656 |
47.6 |
| Mean
Social Security income (dollars) |
11,894 |
(X) |
| With Supplemental Security
Income |
846 |
4.7 |
| Mean
Supplemental Security Income (dollars) |
7,420 |
(X) |
| With public assistance
income |
495 |
2.7 |
| Mean
public assistance income (dollars) |
1,710 |
(X) |
| With retirement income |
3,150 |
17.3 |
| Mean
retirement income (dollars) |
17,953 |
(X) |
| |
|
|
| Families |
8,778 |
100.0 |
| Less than $10,000 |
798 |
9.1 |
| $10,000 to $14,999 |
550 |
6.3 |
| $15,000 to $24,999 |
1,490 |
17.0 |
| $25,000 to $34,999 |
1,366 |
15.6 |
| $35,000 to $49,999 |
1,351 |
15.4 |
| $50,000 to $74,999 |
1,662 |
18.9 |
| $75,000 to $99,999 |
763 |
8.7 |
| $100,000 to $149,999 |
423 |
4.8 |
| $150,000 to $199,999 |
235 |
2.7 |
| $200,000 or more |
140 |
1.6 |
| Median family income
(dollars) |
37,171 |
(X) |
| |
|
|
| Per capita income (dollars) |
22,464 |
(X) |
| Median earnings
(dollars): |
|
|
| Male full-time, year-round
workers |
31,287 |
(X) |
| Female full-time, year-round
workers |
24,882 |
(X) |
| |
|
|
| POVERTY STATUS IN
1999 (below poverty level) |
|
|
| Families |
1,148 |
(X) |
| Percent
below poverty level |
(X) |
13.1 |
| With related children
under 18 years |
585 |
(X) |
| Percent
below poverty level |
(X) |
22.1 |
| With
related children under 5 years |
195 |
(X) |
| Percent
below poverty level |
(X) |
19.0 |
| |
|
|
| Families
with female householder, no husband present |
422 |
(X) |
| Percent
below poverty level |
(X) |
26.0 |
| With related children
under 18 years |
352 |
(X) |
| Percent
below poverty level |
(X) |
36.4 |
| With
related children under 5 years |
101 |
(X) |
| Percent
below poverty level |
(X) |
32.5 |
| |
|
|
| Individuals |
5,790 |
(X) |
| Percent
below poverty level |
(X) |
16.8 |
| 18 years and over |
4,578 |
(X) |
| Percent
below poverty level |
(X) |
15.4 |
| 65
years and over |
1,588 |
(X) |
| Percent
below poverty level |
(X) |
13.0 |
| Related children under
18 years |
1,203 |
(X) |
| Percent
below poverty level |
(X) |
26.4 |
| Related
children 5 to 17 years |
872 |
(X) |
| Percent
below poverty level |
(X) |
26.7 |
| Unrelated individuals
15 years and over |
2,409 |
(X) |
| Percent
below poverty level |
(X) |
21.1 |
Hottest Home Sales: Exclusive
Zip Code Analysis
By NBC 6 Anchor/Reporter Bob Mayer
UPDATED: 12:00 pm EST November 23, 2004
 |
South
Florida is one of the hottest real estate markets
in the country. And now, Bob Mayer has found
which exact zip codes of South Florida are the
hottest. With the help of the Keyes Company,
we commissioned an analysis of the Multiple
Listing Service. That's a database of home sales
across South Florida. Then, we ranked zip codes
in four categories:
· The most properties sold
· The fewest days on the market
· The highest average price
· And the most gain in value.
Want to live in this hot zip code? Camp out!
That's what people did this month, waiting for
these South Beach condos to go on sale. |
I asked, "Did you
ever think that you would live to see the day where
people in South Florida would sleep on the street
waiting to buy a condo?"
"It's amazing. "It's the biggest boom in
South Florida since 1979, 1980."
Our analysis found that zip code 33139 -- South Beach
-- sold the most properties in the last 12 months.
"We have primarily locals buying in lower to
middle tiers, and the out-of-towners tend to buy the
luxury apartments in South Beach,".
He warns, the demand for South Beach living is only
going to increase. Why? "Between June 2003 and
June 2004, the amount of available condos in Miami
Beach decreased by fifty percent,". "Now
is the time to grab what's left."
Number two most sold? 33178 -- Doral/Miami.
Where are prices rising the most? Head east - not
to Las Olas, not to South Beach, but to this modest
area in Broward County, zip code 33009 Hallandale.
Pappas said, "I think everybody sees the Coral
Gables, the Aventura, sees the high-priced markets,
the Pinecrest, the Las Olas, and they're looking for
what I call the next price tier jump."
Prices in Hallandale Beach are certainly jumping.
This area went up an average of nearly 50% per square
foot in the last two years. "People are looking
for the older communities where there is value,"
said Pappas.
The most expensive areas in our analysis? The waterfront
mansions of Las Olas area of Fort Lauderdale, and
the green-covered homes of Coconut Grove. Average
price? About $600,000 to $700,000.
Where are homes selling the fastest? Zip code 33066
-- Coconut Creek -- an average of only 33 days on
the market.
Pappas says, it's because these homes are still affordable:
"Five years ago, 70% to 80% of the homes in South
Florida were under $250,000. Today, less than 25%
are under $250,000 that are on the market. So, through
this appreciation, it's hard to find affordable housing.
And I think that may be an area that you can."
For example, we found two bedroom, two bath condos
listed for only $130,000.
Best zip code in overall combined ranking -- 33076
-- Coral Springs and Parkland, just south of the Palm
Beach border.
"It's just been incredible," said Helfman.
"The prices in this development started in about
the mid-$100s, now they are in the mid-$300s."
The price comes with lake views and a country-club
lifestyle. "You get the feeling of luxury with
a little less price and more for your money out in
that marketplace,"
Tribes to push for full range of casino gambling

By John
Holland
STAFF WRITER
Posted March 10 2005
Tuesday's vote approving slot machines gives the Seminole
and Miccosukee tribes unwelcome competition, but it
also gives them leverage in their push to bring not
just slot machines, but craps, blackjack and other
Las Vegas-style gambling to their Florida casinos.
Federal
regulators said Wednesday the state must now "negotiate
in good faith'' with the tribes on a gaming agreement,
called a compact, that would allow expanded gambling
in exchange for a chunk of the profits. If Florida
doesn't negotiate fairly, the Secretary of the Interior
could ultimately give approval for anyway, said Sean
Pensoneau, spokesman for the National Indian Gaming
Commission.
Such a move is unprecedented, he said, since states
usually reach agreements.
"It's
still early, but the NIGC thinks that this greatly
strengthens the tribes' position that the state must
negotiate a compact,'' Pensoneau said. "If a
class of gaming is available in the state, then the
tribes should be able to offer that class of gaming.''
The tribes
and federal government must wait to see how the state
legislature crafts the new law.
On Tuesday,
Broward County residents voted to allow slot machines
at pari-mutuel tracks in Dania Beach, Pompano Beach
and Hallandale Beach, while Miami-Dade voters rejected
a similar measure.
The situation
is uncertain since only one county, Broward, approved
the slots, and because the vote didn't specify which
level of slots would be allowed. Class 2 machines
currently in tribe casinos are based on a bingo-style
formula in which odds change as each number is pulled.
The federal
government defines Class 3 games as having odds that
remain constant, including craps, blackjack, roulette
and traditional slot machines.
"That's
one of the open items," Gov. Jeb Bush said on
Wednesday. "There's nothing in the initiatives
that says we have to have Class 3 slots."
While
Pensoneau said any federal ruling would apply to all
casinos run by the Seminoles and the Miccosukee, Bush
said that's not necessarily true.
"We
still don't have complete clarity. The Miccosukee
Tribe gambling facility is in Miami-Dade, and they
didn't pass it, so I think we're on new turf here,''
said Bush, who is staunchly opposed to gambling. He
also said that if legislators approve only Class 2
slots for the pari-mutuels, the tribes may not be
entitled to any changes.
Although
slot machines and craps are vastly different games,
they are both considered Class 3. The tribes argue
that if one form of Class 3 is allowed, they are entitled
to all forms.
So far,
only the Miccosukee have approached Bush about the
compact, and the governor said the state will negotiate
when the time comes.
"We have an obligation in law to begin negotiations
for a compact, but it's very hard to do that until
we get all this settled,'' Bush said.
Miccosukee
Chairman Billy Cypress could not be reached for comment
on Tuesday. Seminole Tribal Councilor Max Osceola
said the tribe has been trying to reach a deal with
the state for 15 years and will reopen negotiations
shortly.
"We
still want a compact, but I don't know whether this
vote will help us or hurt us,'' Osceola said. "Basically,
we want to make a deal that will make the state a
partner and let them share the profits.''
In 1979,
the Seminoles became the first tribe in the country
to open a high-stakes bingo hall, overcoming several
legal challenges by the state and former Broward County
Sheriff Bob Butterworth. The ruling said tribes can
offer the same level of gaming as states, equating
state-run lotteries with Indian bingo-style games.
Although
tribes are considered sovereign and free from state
oversight or interference, they still are accountable
to federal law and courts.
Fearing
Indian gaming would become rampant, Congress in 1988
created the Indian Gaming Act that forced tribes and
states to negotiate compacts for table games like
craps, blackjack and roulette and traditional slot
machines. Bingo-style games did not need such approval.
Florida
refused to sign a compact and the Seminoles sued,
arguing their rights were violated. In 1996, the U.S.
Supreme Court sided with Florida, saying states, like
all Indian tribes, are immune from unwanted lawsuits.
The ruling
didn't hurt the Seminoles, who operate large bingo
casinos in Hollywood, Tampa and Coconut Creek, and
lesser ones on the Brighton and Immokalee Reservations
near Lake Okeechobee. The Miccosukee operate a casino
and golf resort in Miami-Dade.
But the
Seminoles want to expand, and argue Tuesday's vote
opens the door.
Although
the Seminoles can't sue in court, they can appeal
to the Department of Interior, which regulates Indian
tribes. Osceola said the Seminoles will not unilaterally
install Class 3 slots or gaming, but plan to file
a petition with the federal government.
"We're
not going to just go out and do what we want, because
that would be cutting off our nose to spite our face,''
Osceola said. "There's a process, and we'll follow
it. But in the end, I think we'll wind up with a Class
3 license.''
Staff
Writer Mark Hollis contributed to this report.
|
to download Hallandale. |
|
|